Re: replication in Postgres

From: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: replication in Postgres
Date: 2007-11-26 18:57:19
Message-ID: 74398.92341.qm@web25806.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


--- Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:

> Glyn Astill wrote:
> > Thanks everyone for your replies. EnterpriseDB looks like the way
> to
> > go if we want good replication.
>
> Sorry, this makes no sense to me -- EnterpriseDB has no replication
> solution that I know of.
>

This is bullsh*t, it does as I've been talking to them this week.

>
> > Postgres-r sounds very nice but moving our organisations data
> onto a
> > system that it work in progress is very scary.
>
> You are already offloading your data to PostgreSQL which is a work
> in
> progress too ...
>

Except Postgress has stable releases and is proven and used in tons
of businesses.

> --
> Alvaro Herrera
> http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/
> "En el principio del tiempo era el desencanto. Y era la
> desolación. Y era
> grande el escándalo, y el destello de monitores y el crujir de
> teclas."
> ("Sean los Pájaros Pulentios", Daniel
> Correa)
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-11-26 19:01:03 Re: replication in Postgres
Previous Message Medi Montaseri 2007-11-26 18:52:52 Re: Migrating from 32 to 64 bit