From: | Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: replication in Postgres |
Date: | 2007-11-26 18:57:19 |
Message-ID: | 74398.92341.qm@web25806.mail.ukl.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
--- Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Glyn Astill wrote:
> > Thanks everyone for your replies. EnterpriseDB looks like the way
> to
> > go if we want good replication.
>
> Sorry, this makes no sense to me -- EnterpriseDB has no replication
> solution that I know of.
>
This is bullsh*t, it does as I've been talking to them this week.
>
> > Postgres-r sounds very nice but moving our organisations data
> onto a
> > system that it work in progress is very scary.
>
> You are already offloading your data to PostgreSQL which is a work
> in
> progress too ...
>
Except Postgress has stable releases and is proven and used in tons
of businesses.
> --
> Alvaro Herrera
> http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/
> "En el principio del tiempo era el desencanto. Y era la
> desolación. Y era
> grande el escándalo, y el destello de monitores y el crujir de
> teclas."
> ("Sean los Pájaros Pulentios", Daniel
> Correa)
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-26 19:01:03 | Re: replication in Postgres |
Previous Message | Medi Montaseri | 2007-11-26 18:52:52 | Re: Migrating from 32 to 64 bit |