| From: | Dan Bikle <dan(dot)bikle(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list |
| Date: | 2009-07-21 23:08:53 |
| Message-ID: | 74252ed10907211608l73394428nc5b802b96a0ace29@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
My opinion is that sfpug is good enough for the entire bay area. We
dont need sjcpug or svpug.
On 7/21/09, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> Sorry to write twice, but i'm actually kind of curious about this.
> Don't we already have an sfpug? Is San Jose and the rest of silicon
> valley not the same group of people as San Francisco?
>
> If it is it seems pretty clear "sv" isn't instantly recognizable. I
> would suggest valleypug :) But really I think I would suggest you
> speak to the sfpug people about having extra locations for sfpug
> events.
>
> --
> greg
> http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-21 23:34:02 | Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-07-21 23:07:09 | Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list |