Re: Include RELKIND_TOASTVALUE in get_relkind_objtype

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "Hsu, John" <hsuchen(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Include RELKIND_TOASTVALUE in get_relkind_objtype
Date: 2019-11-05 18:41:28
Message-ID: 7421.1572979288@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 03:31:27PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd rather do something like the attached, which makes it more of an
>> explicit goal that we won't fail on bad input. (As written, we'd only
>> fail on bad classId, which is a case that really shouldn't happen.)

> Okay, that part looks fine.

Pushed like that, then.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2019-11-05 18:41:55 Re: [Proposal] Arbitrary queries in postgres_fdw
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2019-11-05 18:32:09 Re: Standard-conforming datetime years parsing