From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Import from Linux to |
Date: | 2004-08-14 03:04:05 |
Message-ID: | 740.1092452645@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Should it be backported for the upcoming stable release(s)? Bruce and I
> were discussing this earlier.
Probably a good idea, since we do support psql on Windows even in the
older releases.
My personal opinion is to back-port only as far as 7.4, but if you feel
like doing and testing it for 7.3 then I'll apply the patch. I need it
tomorrow (Sat) though, as I'd like to wrap these releases Sunday.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-14 03:12:36 | Re: Calling PL functions with named parameters |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-14 03:00:02 | Re: Development Schedule Page |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-14 03:51:48 | Re: [Fwd: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Import from Linux to |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-14 02:29:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |