| From: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: convert various variables to atomics |
| Date: | 2026-08-30 18:25:36 |
| Message-ID: | 739848BE-9CAF-4A94-8DA4-FF7DE1D08D51@yandex-team.ru |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Nathan,
On Sun, Aug 30, 2026, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> My interpretation is that the signed atomics stuff would be a follow-up
> effort. I'm still planning to commit the v2 patch set soon.
Thanks, that answers my question.
> If you have questions about the status of one of my commitfest entries,
> please ask before you change it.
Of course, you can commit whatever you consider ready. My question was
about if the latest feedback had been resolved.
I did ask in the thread. I changed the status at the same time because
Ready for Committer did not seem accurate until that question had an
answer. There were six messages after v2 without a response from you:
two positive reviews, followed by the design discussion between Peter,
Andres, and Heikki.
Commitfest entries are there to collect feedback, and their statuses
should reflect whether that feedback has been addressed. What would be
the point of registering the entry otherwise?
You have now clarified that this is follow-up work, so Ready for
Committer accurately describes your intent.
Thank you!
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2026-08-30 18:33:13 | Commitfest manager for September 2026 |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-08-30 18:05:27 | Re: convert various variables to atomics |