Re: Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)
Date: 2017-03-09 19:41:41
Message-ID: 7393.1489088501@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If you don't want to make ExecInitExpr responsible, then the planner would
>> have to do something like split_pathtarget_at_srf anyway to decompose the
>> expressions, no matter which executor representation we use.

> Did we do anything about this? Are we going to?

No, and I think we should. Is it on the v10 open items list?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-03-09 19:46:05 Re: Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-03-09 19:37:53 Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning