David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 02:42:25AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> It's not like we haven't seen a SQL draft go down in flames before.
> Do you think that anything in the windowing functions section will > disappear?
Who's to say?
I have no objection to looking at the 2003 and 200n documents in parallel, especially if there are places where 200n clarifies the intent of 2003. But I'd be suspicious of designing around entirely-new features presented by 200n.