Re: PostgreSQL: Question about rules

From: "Jeremy Smith" <postgres(at)duckwizard(dot)com>
To: "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL: Question about rules
Date: 2006-11-18 00:42:43
Message-ID: 7353a39e0611171642n4f79901aha746c50b8f0e11f7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/17/06, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Why do you need so many functions though? Won't one SQL function do the
> trick?
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
>

You're right, one will do the trick - I was thinking update and
delete, but of course those will be fine with plain rules because they
don't need to do anything with default values.

Even so, I guess I have to use a trigger+function instead of a real
rule, and have an INSTEAD DO NOTHING rule for insert so that the
trigger gets called without error. Seems like a bit of a kludge; I
think I may just give up and do all this stuff in application logic
instead of database logic.

I learned a helluva lot about PG though! Thanks!

Jeremy

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2006-11-18 00:45:24 Re: After Update Triggers
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2006-11-18 00:26:45 Re: After Update Triggers