Re: Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE
Date: 2017-03-10 01:54:24
Message-ID: 7337.1489110864@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> For reasons which must've seemed good to whoever instituted the
>> policy, pg_dump refers to relkinds using the bare letters rather than
>> the constants.

> Even in pg_dump, it appears to me that the large majority of relkind
> references use the symbolic names.

After further study, I think it was psql/describe.c you were remembering.
I cleaned that up...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-03-10 01:54:44 Re: [PATCH] Enabling atomics on ARM64
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-03-10 01:47:45 Re: [PATCH] Teach Catalog.pm how many attributes there should be per DATA() line