Re: killing process question

From: "Johnson, Shaunn" <SJohnson6(at)bcbsm(dot)com>
To: "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: killing process question
Date: 2002-09-19 15:55:18
Message-ID: 73309C2FDD95D11192E60008C7B1D5BB04C73F7B@snt452.corp.bcbsm.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

--okay, but the client has since terminated
--it's session (if i understand you correctly).

--is this just something that will just have to
--hang around until i shutdown the database / boot
--the machine?

-X

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:50 AM
To: shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in
Cc: 'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] killing process question

"Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> I guess a backend should terminate as if connection is closed. What say?

No.

It will terminate when it tries to read the next query from the client.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-19 15:58:24 Re: Memory Errors...
Previous Message Johnson, Shaunn 2002-09-19 15:53:04 keeping a log / debug info

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-09-19 15:58:55 Re: killing process question
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-19 15:49:39 Re: killing process question