Re: inherit support for foreign tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: inherit support for foreign tables
Date: 2015-04-26 13:25:39
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> FWIW, I think we're getting pretty close to the point, or are there
> even, where we can remove default_with_oids. So not adding complications
> because of it sounds good to me.

Well, pg_dump uses it --- so the argument about not breaking old dump
scripts would apply to any attempt to remove it entirely. But I don't
have a problem with saying that its semantics are frozen.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2015-04-26 13:34:12 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2015-04-26 13:02:34 Re: Fix pgbench --progress report under (very) low rate