Re: inherit support for foreign tables

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: inherit support for foreign tables
Date: 2015-04-26 08:36:42
Message-ID: 20150426083642.GA18789@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-04-25 20:47:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Since default_with_oids is really only meant as a backwards-compatibility
> hack, I don't personally have a problem with restricting it to act only on
> plain tables.

FWIW, I think we're getting pretty close to the point, or are there
even, where we can remove default_with_oids. So not adding complications
because of it sounds good to me.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-04-26 09:22:01 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2015-04-26 07:19:12 Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context