Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL
Date: 2002-05-02 14:23:35
Message-ID: 7311.1020349415@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Here are the precise conditions to trigger the scenario:

> (1) the backend is PostgreSQL 6.5.x
> (2) multibyte support is enabled (--enable-multibyte)
> (3) the database encoding is SQL_ASCII (other encodings are not
> affected by the bug).
> (4) the client encoding is set to other than SQL_ASCII

> I think I am responsible for this since I originally wrote the
> code. Sorry for this. I'm going to make back port patches to fix the
> problem for pre 7.2 versions.

It doesn't really seem worth the trouble to make patches for 6.5.x.
If someone hasn't upgraded yet, they aren't likely to install patches
either. (ISTR there are other known security risks in 6.5, anyway.)
If the problem is fixed in 7.0 and later, why not just tell people to
upgrade?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2002-05-02 14:28:36 Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-05-02 14:15:29 Re: Using views and MS access via odbc