|From:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|To:||Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> I'd like to pick this patch up and see it through to commit/push.
> Presumably that will include back-patching to all supported pg versions.
> Before I go through the effort to back-patch, does anyone want to argue
> that this should *not* be back-patched?
Hm, I'm -0.5 or so. I think changing security-related behaviors
in a stable branch is a hard sell unless you are closing a security
hole. This is a fine improvement for HEAD but I'm inclined to
leave the back branches alone.
regards, tom lane
|Next Message||Tom Lane||2022-02-06 18:09:41||Re: Release notes for February minor releases|
|Previous Message||Andrew Dunstan||2022-02-06 17:06:41||Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson|