Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)
Date: 1999-12-09 06:30:19
Message-ID: 7300.944721019@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> writes:
> the port's going to be excellent, though I'm steadily building up a list
> of Postgres bugs to report (I'll wait until I have a dozen or so).

Actually, I think it's easier to keep track of things if you file bug
reports as separate messages, rather than one big message that lists a
bunch of unrelated problems. So feel free to send 'em in as you find
'em.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 1999-12-09 07:28:11 RE: [INTERFACES] Transaction support in 6.5.3/JDBC
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-12-09 06:20:48 Re: [HACKERS] pg_sorttemp hits 2GB during index construction