HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed?
Date: 2020-02-28 13:14:51
Message-ID: 72fff73f-dc9c-4ef4-83e8-d2e60c98df48@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I came across the HAVE_WORKING_LINK define in pg_config_manual.h.
AFAICT, hard links are supported on Windows and Cygwin in the OS
versions that we support, and pg_upgrade already contains the required
shim. It seems to me we could normalize and simplify that, as in the
attached patches. (Perhaps rename durable_link_or_rename() then.) I
successfully tested on MSVC, MinGW, and Cygwin.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-pg_standby-Don-t-use-HAVE_WORKING_LINK.patch text/plain 1018 bytes
0002-Move-pg_upgrade-s-Windows-link-implementation-to-AC_.patch text/plain 6.7 KB
0003-Remove-HAVE_WORKING_LINK.patch text/plain 2.0 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-02-28 13:44:51 Re: more ALTER .. DEPENDS ON EXTENSION fixes
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-02-28 13:02:17 Re: Add PostgreSQL home page to --help output