Re: Adding comments to help understand psql hidden queries

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: David Christensen <david+pg(at)pgguru(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding comments to help understand psql hidden queries
Date: 2024-04-04 14:31:58
Message-ID: 72f6995a-75a6-4579-9e93-45a80f6bd956@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03.04.24 19:16, David Christensen wrote:
> I removed _() in the output of the query/stars since there'd be no
> sensible existing translations for the constructed string, which
> included the query string itself. If we need it for the "QUERY"
> string, this could be added fairly easily, but the existing piece
> would have been nonsensical and never used in practice.

"QUERY" is currently translated. Your patch loses that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maiquel Grassi 2024-04-04 14:34:20 RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+
Previous Message Melih Mutlu 2024-04-04 14:28:35 Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm