Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade to clusters with a different WAL segment size

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade to clusters with a different WAL segment size
Date: 2018-03-25 19:02:06
Message-ID: 72bd06f8-cdfe-b95d-5b3c-529712473166@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/21/18 17:14, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> Here is an updated set of patches that use the newly proposed approach
> for avoiding division-by-zero errors in pg_resetwal.

committed

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arthur Zakirov 2018-03-25 20:54:10 Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-03-25 18:28:29 Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries