Re: OpenSSL support in our back branches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL support in our back branches
Date: 2017-04-15 23:13:04
Message-ID: 7294.1492297984@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2017-04-15 18:04:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I see that buildfarm member anchovy has been failing in pre-9.5
>> branches for the last several weeks, with symptoms suggesting that
>> it's been updated to openssl 1.1.0 or later. The failures are
>> unsurprising given that commit 593d4e47d wasn't back-patched further
>> than 9.5, but I wonder whether it isn't time to do that now.

> +1.

> I think Andreas already did some of the required work in
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/0c817abb-3f7d-20fb-583a-58f7593a0bea%40proxel.se

Oh, right. I'll see what I can do with that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-04-16 01:14:07 Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2017-04-15 22:37:15 Failed recovery with new faster 2PC code