"Gregory Maxwell" <gmaxwell(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> There seems to be some behavior change in current CVS with respect to
> gist and gin indexes on varchar[]. Some side effect of the tsearch2
> merge?
I think more likely I broke it during the opfamily rewrite :-(. Looks
like I left out entries for _varchar (and _cidr too) thinking that the
binary-compatible functions in the same opfamily for _text and _inet
would serve ... but they won't, because arrays are never really "binary
compatible" (you have to at least substitute the other element type
OID). Will fix.
regards, tom lane