Re: SQL/JSON features for v15

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON features for v15
Date: 2022-08-23 17:45:38
Message-ID: 726612.1661276738@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> út 23. 8. 2022 v 19:27 odesílatel Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> napsal:
>> I think that's not true unfortunately. You can specify return types, and
>> composite types can be populated. Which essentially requires arbitrary
>> coercions.

> Please, can you send an example? Maybe we try to fix a feature that is not
> required by standard.

Even if it is required by spec, I'd have zero hesitation about tossing
that case overboard if that's what we need to do to get to a shippable
feature.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-08-23 17:47:40 Re: archive modules
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2022-08-23 17:39:30 Re: archive modules