Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax

From: "Francisco Reyes" <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, <bitsandbytes88(at)hotmail(dot)com>, <valiouk(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax
Date: 2008-07-22 19:30:21
Message-ID: 7262a9b6ab4a76eab29fc9d94226baec@stringsutils.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On 10:45 am 07/22/08 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> [ redirecting to pgsql-docs ]
> number-of-buffers. I agree it's not entirely obvious that what it
> means is "multiply your setting in KB/MB by 8400/8192". Anybody have
> an idea how to clarify things?

Perhaps changing the table title?
Table 17-2. Configuration parameters affecting PostgreSQL's shared memory
usage when not using a size modified.

Alternatively, below the table we could have clarifications such as:
Previously, it was not possible to indicate a size modified such as M for
Megabytes. As of version X.Y, Postgresql allows to use M, for MB, GB for GB
and more... See.... for all values.

When not using one of the new modifiers the space used would be the number
you enter times the constant on the right side of the table.
For example using 100 shared_buffers would be 100 x 8400 = 840,000 bytes.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gibson Chimhamhiwa 2008-07-23 09:23:41 Re: Welcome to the pgsql-admin list!
Previous Message Shane Ambler 2008-07-22 18:47:51 Re: conditional logging based on client

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-07-24 17:54:31 Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-07-22 14:45:59 Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-22 19:51:45 Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-07-22 19:01:04 Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements