| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why does PostgresNode.pm set such a low value of max_wal_senders? |
| Date: | 2020-09-29 23:04:22 |
| Message-ID: | 726243.1601420662@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2020-Sep-29, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I wonder why PostgresNode.pm is doing
>> print $conf "max_wal_senders = 5\n";
>> Considering that our default these days is 10 senders, and that a
>> walsender slot doesn't really cost much, this seems unduly cheapskate.
>> I propose raising this to 10.
> I suggest to remove that line. max_wal_senders used to default to 0
> when PostgresNode was touched to have this line in commit 89ac7004dad;
> the global default was raised in f6d6d2920d2c.
Hm. We could do so back to v10 where that came in, and there are no
src/test/subscription tests before v10, so that should be sufficient.
Sold.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2020-09-30 00:45:23 | Re: Parallel Full Hash Join |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-09-29 22:44:48 | Re: Why does PostgresNode.pm set such a low value of max_wal_senders? |