Re: pgxs default installation + various fixes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgxs default installation + various fixes
Date: 2004-09-02 16:10:09
Message-ID: 7252.1094141409@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> What was the argument for having an "install-all-headers" target in the
> first place?

By my count it adds about 2 megabytes to the installed footprint, which
perhaps is not so much now as it was at the time.

A larger problem from my point of view is that the installation process
seems quite inefficient. "make install-all-headers" takes a full minute
on my devel machine, which is above my threshold of pain for something
that I often do more than once a day.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2004-09-02 20:15:21 Re: beta2 rpms
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-09-02 15:48:34 Re: Last version of configure was built with wrong autoconf release

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-09-02 17:48:32 getrusage on win32
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2004-09-02 15:52:29 Typo in initdb.c