Re: small test case for abbrev(cidr)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: small test case for abbrev(cidr)
Date: 2021-02-08 19:29:41
Message-ID: 720889.1612812581@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I noticed that the file src/backend/utils/adt/inet_cidr_ntop.c has no
> test coverage at all. The only way to reach this appears to be by
> calling abbrev(cidr). It was easy to add a test case for this into the
> existing, otherwise pretty complete, cidr tests.

Seems reasonable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Borisov 2021-02-08 19:31:13 Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-02-08 19:28:47 Re: parse mistake in ecpg connect string