Re: postgresql bug

From: "Gregory S(dot) Williamson" <gsw(at)globexplorer(dot)com>
To: "Wyatt Tellis" <wyatt(dot)tellis(at)radiology(dot)ucsf(dot)edu>, "Mark Leet" <thinkingstuff(at)gmail(dot)com>, <wtellis(at)radiology(dot)ucsf(dot)edu>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql bug
Date: 2006-11-28 00:41:40
Message-ID: 71E37EF6B7DCC1499CEA0316A256832802B3E92D@loki.wc.globexplorer.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Best to always use the list as a resource, not individuals (since a person such as yourself would then be able to find the latest related issues when doing a web-search). I've cc-ed the general list on principle.

The error I got had to do with a failing disk in a linux system. I have no clues about windows operations, but other posters have indicated that excluding postgres from virus scanners is A Good Thing, but as I say I don't do windows, really.

Greg Williamson
DBA
GlobeXplorer LLC

-----Original Message-----
From: Wyatt Tellis [mailto:wyatt(dot)tellis(at)radiology(dot)ucsf(dot)edu]
Sent: Mon 11/27/2006 4:27 PM
To: Mark Leet; Gregory S. Williamson; wtellis(at)radiology(dot)ucsf(dot)edu
Cc:
Subject: Re: postgresql bug

Hi Mark,

It seems our problem was our Legato/EMC Networker backup process. Due to an incorrect exclusion directive, it was locking the data files during the nightly backup. I suspect this is similar to what you're experiencing. I haven't tried filing a bug report. One of the responses to my post suggested I switch to a "real OS" like Linux, so I wouldn't be surprised if this got rejected as an OS bug instead of a PSQL one.

-Wyatt

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:27:27 +1000
"Mark Leet" <thinkingstuff(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
>One of my customers had this problem:
>ERROR: could not open relation 1663/16907/2601: Invalid argument.
>
>So I googled it and came across your discussion on the postgres mail archives:
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-09/msg01270.php
>
>This error seems to be limited to people running PostgreSQL under Windows, but not all of them.
>
>Is there any chance that your anti-virus was the culprit? Because the error doesn't happen on all machines, I wondered out loud what might be different between my machine and my customer's. Anti-virus was one. In his anti-virus program (eTrust EZ Antivirus), he excluded the partition he had PostgreSQL on, and he no longer receives the error.
>
>I use Symantec Antivirus and don't receive the error. Another computer was running Computer Associates Antivirus and had the error. I changed it to Symantec Antivirus and the error no longer appears.
>
>Next question, how do we get this theory to the bug fixers?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mark.
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------
Click link below if it is SPAM gsw(at)globexplorer(dot)com
"https://mailscanner.globexplorer.com/dspam/dspam.cgi?signatureID=456b824a198381804284693&user=gsw(at)globexplorer(dot)com&retrain=spam&template=history&history_page=1"
!DSPAM:456b824a198381804284693!
-------------------------------------------------------

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-11-28 00:45:42 Re: NULLs ;-)
Previous Message Scott Ribe 2006-11-28 00:37:53 NULLs ;-)