Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>,PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11
Date: 2018-09-15 18:17:24
Message-ID: 71A15FC7-7824-4EF4-8D10-4CE19C70F73E@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On September 15, 2018 12:14:07 PM MDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> Cool, sounds we have agreement. I'll try to come up with a patch.
>I'm [un]fortunately hiking till Wednesday, so I won't have an easy time
>to push a patch. I probably could push something tomorrow, but I'd
>have a hard time cleaning up if needed. Does anybody feel we should
>have that in Mondays release?
>
>Recent discussions among the release team are pointing to the idea
>that Monday's wrap could be 11rc1, not 11beta4, if we get this done
>beforehand. So I'd kind of like to see it done.

Yes, that's why I'm asking...

>Is there more that has to be done than switching the GUC's default
>value and adjusting docs? I could probably make it happen if there's
>not any hidden stuff to worry about.

No, that should be all. I'll adapt the llvm animals to force the GUC to on. I think it'd be good to add a paragraph to the release notes, mentioning that it has to be turned on.

Thanks!

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-09-15 18:19:55 Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-09-15 18:14:07 Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11