Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
Date: 2008-03-05 17:35:53
Message-ID: 718.1204738553@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
>>> If you really need to embed an
>>> SQL engine in a binary, consider the excellent
>>> <a href="http://www.sqlite.org/">SQLite</a>
>>
>> or <a href="http://http://www.firebirdsql.org/">Firebird</a>
>>
> for the purpose.
>>
>> Just to be fair.

> sqlite seems much more appropriate for embedding.

Is it really a good idea to be recommending particular other products?
And don't forget that the next thing on that list would be mysql.

If we need a FAQ entry on this at all, I'd stop after David's first two
sentences.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2008-03-05 17:41:26 Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-05 17:09:44 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on long column values