| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Compiling on Termux |
| Date: | 2018-12-21 22:51:52 |
| Message-ID: | 7177.1545432712@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 9:19 AM David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>> I don't know precisely how it's going to play with Postgres, but
>> Termux does supply a Postgres in its native packages. That package
>> appears to work, at least in the single-connection case, so they're
>> doing something somehow to get it up and running.
> They use libandroid-shmem which emulates SysV shmem.
Interesting. I wonder how well it emulates the aspect we actually
care about, ie counting the number of attached processes correctly ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-12-21 23:04:02 | Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-12-21 22:29:14 | Re: Compiling on Termux |