| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sam Stearns <sam(dot)stearns(at)dat(dot)com>, Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Garza <peter(dot)garza(at)dat(dot)com>, Henry Ashu <henry(dot)ashu(at)dat(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Same Table Name - 2 Owners |
| Date: | 2024-10-04 22:22:28 |
| Message-ID: | 717426.1728080548@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Friday, October 4, 2024, Sam Stearns <sam(dot)stearns(at)dat(dot)com> wrote:
>> Is it possible to do this in Postgres?
> Within PostgreSQL, two objects can have the same name if they are of
> different types (note, relations is a fairly broad type category) or they
> exist in different schemas.
The Oracle case probably also works by putting the tables in different
schemas. I recall hearing that Oracle identifies "owner" with
"schema" much more closely than we do.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2024-10-05 07:07:05 | Re: Same Table Name - 2 Owners |
| Previous Message | Holger Jakobs | 2024-10-04 22:21:27 | Re: Same Table Name - 2 Owners |