| From: | "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Ashutosh Bapat" <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon |
| Date: | 2018-06-05 14:58:44 |
| Message-ID: | 71725ACFC712498FAECF9D7EECF4138D@tunaPC |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: Simon Riggs
> Passing detailed info between servers is exactly what XL does.
>
> It requires us to define a cluster, exactly as XL does.
>
> And yes, its a good idea to replicate some tables to all nodes, as
XL does.
>
> So it seems we have at last some agreement that some of the things
XL
> does are the correct approaches.
Exactly. I was impressed when I read the paper on XC for the first
time. I respect what Suzuki-san and people from NTT, EnterpriseDB,
and 2ndQuadrant have done for XC/XL. Just like some people believe we
should leverage the artifact for FDW, I think we should leverage the
code and idea of XC/XL.
Regards
MauMau
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-06-05 15:03:07 | Re: commitfest 2018-07 |
| Previous Message | gilberto.castillo | 2018-06-05 14:57:54 | Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: Code of Conduct plan |