Re: proposal \gcsv

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal \gcsv
Date: 2020-04-07 17:27:36
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Here's a more fully fleshed-out patch, with documentation and some
test cases. (0001 patch is identical to last time.)

Considering this is the last day before v13 feature freeze, should
I push this, or sit on it till v14? I feel reasonably good that we
have a nice feature definition here, but it's awfully late in the
cycle to be designing features.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-pset-option-infrastructure-1.patch text/x-diff 7.6 KB
0002-pset-options-for-slash-g-2.patch text/x-diff 14.1 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2020-04-07 17:29:06 Re: SLRU statistics
Previous Message Asif Rehman 2020-04-07 17:25:05 Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup