| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions |
| Date: | 2006-06-22 21:22:19 |
| Message-ID: | 7160.1151011339@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Bort, Paul wrote:
>>> so presumably this is only needed for old Cygwin versions. Can anyone
>>> say how old "1001" is and whether we still ought to care about it?
>>
>> IIRC, I've been on 1.5.x for at least three years. 1.0/1.1 seems to be
>> around 2000/2001, based on a quick Google. So it's definitely older than
>> PG 7.3.
> 1.3 was announced in May 2001 according to the cygwin announce mailing
> list archives, so I think we can safely ignore the section in question.
OK, so let's yank the file altogether and see what happens.
I can make a cut at fixing the makefiles based on removing references to
DLLINIT, but it might be better if someone who's in a position to test
the results on Windows did the patch ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-06-22 21:30:18 | Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-22 21:08:50 | Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 |