Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS
Date: 2025-09-04 15:12:56
Message-ID: 7132f28c-1437-4723-a363-c19b99a33bec@aklaver.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/4/25 08:03, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> In the same vein as v18betas breaking our unit-tests...
> (we still don't understand, haven't looked much though).
>
> OK, above it's about a major upgrade. So that's one thing.
>
> But now, we've ascertain that a particular test is:
>
> OK with 16.9 and 17.5 (we cannot test on beta2 anymore)
> KO with 16.10 and 17.6 (and beta3 too, released at the same time)

How did you move from one version to the other?

>
> Which for a minor patch is a surprise to us, not in a good way.
>
> So... Did anything change around RLS in this patch series?
> Anything changed around ROLE INHERIT rules?
>
> The symptom is that a LOGIN user lacks ROLEs is used to have.
> So perhaps some GRANTs are now silently doing nothing,
> for some unknown reasons.

What are the GRANTs that are done to give the user the privileges?

>
> What in these patches could be affecting those areas?
>
> Thanks, --DD
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2025-09-04 15:18:31 Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS
Previous Message Dominique Devienne 2025-09-04 15:03:25 Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS