| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |
| Date: | 2025-09-04 15:12:56 |
| Message-ID: | 7132f28c-1437-4723-a363-c19b99a33bec@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 9/4/25 08:03, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> In the same vein as v18betas breaking our unit-tests...
> (we still don't understand, haven't looked much though).
>
> OK, above it's about a major upgrade. So that's one thing.
>
> But now, we've ascertain that a particular test is:
>
> OK with 16.9 and 17.5 (we cannot test on beta2 anymore)
> KO with 16.10 and 17.6 (and beta3 too, released at the same time)
How did you move from one version to the other?
>
> Which for a minor patch is a surprise to us, not in a good way.
>
> So... Did anything change around RLS in this patch series?
> Anything changed around ROLE INHERIT rules?
>
> The symptom is that a LOGIN user lacks ROLEs is used to have.
> So perhaps some GRANTs are now silently doing nothing,
> for some unknown reasons.
What are the GRANTs that are done to give the user the privileges?
>
> What in these patches could be affecting those areas?
>
> Thanks, --DD
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-09-04 15:18:31 | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |
| Previous Message | Dominique Devienne | 2025-09-04 15:03:25 | Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |