Re: pg_overexplain extension name

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_overexplain extension name
Date: 2025-07-14 19:00:04
Message-ID: 711399.1752519604@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 5:23 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Do we want that as the name of this new extension?

> Personally, I think it's fine. We ought to discourage the idea that
> this is just "explain, but better".

I agree that it's a tad cutesy, but the time to complain about this
name was > two months ago. I can't see renaming it post-beta2.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2025-07-14 19:00:21 Re: pg_overexplain extension name
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-07-14 18:54:20 Re: pg_overexplain extension name