| From: | "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, justin <justin(at)emproshunts(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Brian Hurt" <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
| Date: | 2008-12-16 19:53:08 |
| Message-ID: | 70c01d1d0812161153g6de5ba03hd8303c027e9ccc@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Jonah H. Harris <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> Well, then the first order of business would be to write a benchmark kit. I
>> have been thinking for a while that we should make our own maintained
>> version of the DBT+* suite, or whatever other suite is appropriate. And
>> then start running it.
>
> Agreed. For a start on TPC-C, EnterpriseDB has a closer version of the kit.
I don't recall turning away patches to make the dbt kits less TPC spec
compliant...
Regards,
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Wong | 2008-12-16 19:56:07 | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
| Previous Message | Dan Langille | 2008-12-16 16:55:12 | Re: copy/paste URL for a tarball |