Re: Why so many out-of-disk-space failures on buildfarm machines?

From: "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why so many out-of-disk-space failures on buildfarm machines?
Date: 2007-07-24 00:04:48
Message-ID: 70c01d1d0707231704l60603c6dndc98e80ab08ee416@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/18/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > I don't think we're ever going to fix things for the 7.3 error you're
> > getting - please take it out of your rotation. 7.3 isn't quite as dead
> > as Joshua suggested earlier, but it's certainly on life support.
>
> I checked the CVS logs and it appears that we fixed several contrib
> modules, not only cube, to work with flex 2.5.31 during the 7.4 devel
> cycle. I don't think anyone cares to back-port that much work. Our
> position should be "if you want to build 7.3 you need flex 2.5.4 to do
> it".
>
> If Mark still wants to test 7.3, he could install flex 2.5.4 someplace
> and make sure that's first in the PATH while building 7.3.

I have flex 2.5.33 on the system, but I have decided to take the easy
way out and removed 7.3 out of my rotation.

Regards,
Mark

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-07-24 00:24:23 Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-07-23 22:11:55 Re: Reviewing new index types (was Re: [PATCHES] Updatedbitmap indexpatch)