Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Storing Binary Large Objects

From: "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: "Rich Shepard" <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com>, pdxpug(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Storing Binary Large Objects
Date: 2007-03-29 15:35:02
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pdxpug
On 3/29/07, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2007, at 06:37, Rich Shepard wrote:
> >   I think we'll keep them on disk, separate from the database, and use
> > pointers to them.
> That's what Bricolage does, and as long as your App has access to
> them on the file system (i.e., you don't have an array of app servers
> with their own file systems), it works just fine—especially for a Web
> app, where the Web server can handle actually *serving* the file.
> But I would like to see BLOBs become a lot easier to use in
> PostgreSQL...

On paper, using bytea looks more straightforward the oid datatype.
Does bytea have its own difficulties, other than having to find a way
to escape the data?


In response to


pdxpug by date

Next:From: Ian BurrellDate: 2007-03-29 17:37:13
Subject: Re: Storing Binary Large Objects
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2007-03-29 15:22:52
Subject: Re: Storing Binary Large Objects

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group