Re: archive modules

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: archive modules
Date: 2022-11-15 09:31:44
Message-ID: 70b17eac-c502-6b1d-4637-7c3d0256204e@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05.11.22 21:51, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 12:05:26PM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
>> cfbot reports the patch no longer applies [1]. As CommitFest 2022-11 is
>> currently underway, this would be an excellent time to update the patch.
>
> Indeed. Here is a new version of the patch.

I have committed this to master.

The surrounding code has changed a bit between PG15 and master, so if we
wanted to backpatch this, we'd need another patch from you. However, at
this point, I'm content to just leave it be in PG15.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2022-11-15 09:34:29 Re: SUBTRANS: Minimizing calls to SubTransSetParent()
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2022-11-15 09:13:36 Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block