Re: file_fdw vs relative paths

From: Li Japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: file_fdw vs relative paths
Date: 2020-08-25 07:28:41
Message-ID: 70C4CA98-1C0D-426B-9814-92569A5331B6@hotmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Aug 25, 2020, at 8:26 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us<mailto:bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>> wrote:

Yes, I tested back to 9.5 too:

CREATE EXTENSION file_fdw;
CREATE SERVER pgconf FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER file_fdw;
CREATE FOREIGN TABLE pgconf (line TEXT) SERVER pgconf OPTIONS ( filename
'postgresql.conf', format 'text', delimiter E'\x7f' );
SELECT * FROM pgconf;
# -----------------------------
# PostgreSQL configuration file
# -----------------------------
#
# This file consists of lines of the form:

The file_fdw extension was introduced by commit 7c5d0ae7078456bfeedb2103c45b9a32285c2631,
and I tested it supports relative paths. This is a doc bug.

--
Japin Li

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2020-08-25 07:32:42 Re: Row estimates for empty tables
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-08-25 06:57:27 Re: proposal - function string_to_table