Re: [HACKERS] Refactoring identifier checks to consistently use strcmp

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Refactoring identifier checks to consistently use strcmp
Date: 2018-01-27 20:19:22
Message-ID: 70B5CE04-A92E-45B7-A99C-EE6CBF11721D@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 27 Jan 2018, at 00:36, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I've pushed this mostly as-is.

Thanks!

> I also took out the parser changes related to
> allowing unquoted PARALLEL in old-style CREATE AGGREGATE, because that
> is not a goal I consider worthy of adding extra grammar complexity.
> We don't document that PARALLEL works there, and there has never been
> any expectation that deprecated legacy syntax would grow new options
> as needed to have feature parity with the modern syntax.

Ok, didn’t know old syntax wasn’t extended to support new options so I went
after it having run into the regress tests using it.

> I also trimmed the new regression test cases a bit, as most of them seemed
> pretty duplicative.

Makes sense, they were made verbose to aid review but were too chatty for
inclusion.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-01-27 21:09:15 Re: STATISTICS retained in CREATE TABLE ... LIKE (INCLUDING ALL)?
Previous Message Arthur Zakirov 2018-01-27 19:19:08 Re: [HACKERS] PoC: custom signal handler for extensions