RE: [SQL] Re: create view security

From: "Wallingford, Ted" <twallingford(at)indexc(dot)com>
To: "'Jan Wieck'" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "'pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)orgg
Subject: RE: [SQL] Re: create view security
Date: 2000-06-01 12:04:53
Message-ID: 70866BD37E22D4119D8000600899F70D011CD0@INDEXAPP00
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hi Jan,

Thanks for the insight, but can you tell me if the PostgreSQL ODBC driver
for Windows works with PostgreSQL 7.0?

thx,
Ted

_________________________________________________
Ted Wallingford
Manager of Information Technology
Independence Excavating, Inc.
Precision Environmental Co.
Independence Communications, Inc.
www.indexc.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: JanWieck(at)t-online(dot)de [mailto:JanWieck(at)t-online(dot)de]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 10:25 PM
> To: Peter Eisentraut
> Cc: Wallingford, Ted; 'pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org';
> pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)orgg
> Subject: Re: [SQL] Re: [ADMIN] create view security
>
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Wallingford, Ted writes:
> >
> > > I am using 6.3 in this case.
> >
> > I'm sorry but that is pre-historic era around here and no one really
> > remembers what the problems might have been back then
> (other than that
> > they were surely plenty). Upgrading might be your best bet
> on all fronts.
>
> You're wrong - I remember, not 100% sure, but good enough.
>
> Just two weeks ago (funny - isn't it) I made a deal with a
> friend, exchanging this old 486/33DLC, 8MB, 1GB portable
> (640x480 gray but onboard SCSI!) with a planimeter (nice
> mechanic tool that fit's perfectly into my sliderule
> collection - that friend collects sliderules too so he knows
> how to get me :-).
>
> That old portable was the computer, most of the rule system
> fixes for v6.4 where developed on. I'm pretty sure that the
> Rule-Owner-Needs-Perm changes where part of it.
>
> The executor is doing a permisson check of the result- and
> all scan relations just before starting the execution. For
> v6.4 (or was THAT in 6.5 - dunno exactly) I added a little
> flag to the rangetable entry that tells "this relation is
> accessed through a view and permissions are already checked".
> Since then, it was the rewriter that checked if the view-
> owner would have the permissions for all relations used by
> the view.
>
> Anyway, upgrading IS the best (if not the only) choice for
> him.
>
>
> Jan
>
> --
>
> #=============================================================
> =========#
> # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for
> being right. #
> # Let's break this rule - forgive me.
> #
> #==================================================
> JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
Wallingford, Ted.vcf application/octet-stream 137 bytes

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message guenther mair 2000-06-01 12:49:02 double dumps for all objects with pg_dump
Previous Message R D 2000-06-01 12:04:44 Re: Re: few more securiry questions :-)