Re: peripatus build failures....

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: peripatus build failures....
Date: 2018-07-07 15:24:48
Message-ID: 70759.1530977088@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 11:11:24AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
>>> f044d71e331d77a0039cec0a11859b5a3c72bc95 fixed it.

>> Don't think I believe that conclusion; that patch shouldn't
>> have affected anything at all for non-ARM architectures.

> Those are the 2 adjacent commits in src/port.

You're assuming something not in evidence, which is that the critical
change was textually within src/port/. It might have been in configure,
for instance, or in Makefile.global, or some other upper-level makefile.
I'd just do a straight bisect run without any assumptions about which part
of the tree matters.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2018-07-07 16:05:00 Re: peripatus build failures....
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2018-07-07 15:20:51 Re: peripatus build failures....