Re: Test::More version

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Test::More version
Date: 2021-11-20 14:08:27
Message-ID: 7055e5a4-c78e-ef4b-69ca-a33cf26c01cd@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 11/15/21 12:43, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> So, discounting prairiedog's intentionally trailing-edge installation,
> the oldest stuff in the buildfarm is 0.98, of which there are five
> instances belonging to four different owners.
>
> Based on this, I'm inclined to think we should select 0.98 as the
> minimum version. Anything later would inconvenience some people.
> OTOH, it doesn't look like there's any value in promising compatibility
> with 0.96 instead, especially since I see a couple of subplan-related
> bug fixes in 0.97 and 0.98 in Test::Simple's changelog.
>
>

Yeah, so I think at this stage we're just waiting for you to update
prairiedog and we can make this change.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-11-20 14:13:11 rename SnapBuild* macros in slot.c
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-11-20 13:56:42 Re: Should rename "startup process" to something else?