| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |
| Date: | 2017-10-05 14:57:00 |
| Message-ID: | 7031.1507215420@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> We'd definitely need to do things that way in 9.6. I'm not quite sure
>> whether it's too late to adopt the clean solution in v10.
> It probably is now. Are you still planning to do something about this patch?
It's still on my list, but I didn't get to it during the CF.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-10-05 15:43:24 | Re: Parallel Append implementation |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-10-05 14:52:27 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow multiple tables to be specified in one VACUUM or ANALYZE c |