Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints
Date: 2021-05-10 16:14:46
Message-ID: 700978.1620663286@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Looks like it did, but turned out to have some unintended side-effects
> :(.
> The snapshot builds are now new:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=flaviventris&dt=2021-05-10%2015%3A43%3A56&stg=configure
> configure:3966: ccache /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc --version >&5
> gcc (Debian 20210421-1) 11.0.1 20210421 (prerelease) [gcc-11 revision fbb7739892e:d13ce34bd01:3756d99dab6a268d0d8a17583980a86f23f0595a]
> But the aforementioned dependencies that needed to remove broke the
> installed old versions of gcc/clang.
> I started to build the old versions of llvm manually, but that then hits
> the issue that at least 3.9 doesn't build with halfway modern versions
> of gcc/clang. So I gotta do it stepwise (i.e. go backwards, build llvm
> n-2 with n-1), will take a bit of time.

Ugh. Memo to self: don't rag on other peoples' buildfarm configurations
right before a release deadline :-(. Sorry to cause you trouble.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-05-10 16:38:56 Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-05-10 16:08:22 Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints