Re: Range types

From: Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Scott Bailey <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net>, hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Range types
Date: 2009-12-14 20:12:48
Message-ID: 6fa3b6e20912141212r53dca3c6of498e34bc9dee02f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Right, I don't think strings are any more or less countable than integers.
> (and yes, it's a bit OT).

Well, if I remember my algebra, I think the issue is that integers are
locally finite whereas strings are not ( assuming standard orderings,
of course ).

-Nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-14 20:24:21 Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-12-14 20:08:10 Re: Aggregate ORDER BY patch