Re: ICU integration

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ICU integration
Date: 2017-01-24 17:45:56
Message-ID: 6ee64972-fc4d-b169-7f25-0940118f59ce@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/9/17 3:45 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> * I think it's worth looking into ucol_nextSortKeyPart(), and using
> that as an alternative to ucol_getSortKey(). It doesn't seem any
> harder, and when I tested it it was clearly faster. (I think that
> ucol_nextSortKeyPart() is more or less intended to be used for
> abbreviated keys.)

I will try to look into that.

> * I think that it's not okay that convert_string_datum() still uses
> strxfrm() without considering if it's an ICU build. That's why I
> raised the idea of a pg_strxfrm() wrapper at one point.

That code works in a locale-agnostic way now, which might be
questionable, but it's not the fault of this patch, I think.

> * Similarly, I think that check_strxfrm_bug() should have something
> about ICU. It's looking for a particular bug in some very old version
> of Solaris 8. At a minimum, check_strxfrm_bug() should now not run at
> all (a broken OS strxfrm() shouldn't be a problem with ICU).

But we'll still be using strxfrm for the database default locale, so we
need to keep that check.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-01-24 17:56:36 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-01-24 17:44:11 Re: ICU integration