Re: anonymous unions (C11)

From: "Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: anonymous unions (C11)
Date: 2025-09-23 10:16:11
Message-ID: 6ea949fe-6a65-4769-ba26-57c290205329@app.fastmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025, at 11:38, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is another patch set to sprinkle some C11 features around the
> code. My aim is to make a little bit of use of several C11 features
> as examples and encouragement for future code, and to test compilers
> (although we're not yet at the point where this should really stress
> any compiler).

Nice, didn't know about this C11 feature.

I've eyeballed the entire output of `git diff --word-diff-regex=.` and can't see any oddities.

I've also run the full test suite and it passes.

/Joel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-09-23 10:36:33 Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2025-09-23 10:11:44 Re: Fix overflow of nbatch