| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Wasim Devale <wasimd60(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Gaspare Boscarino, P(dot)Eng(dot)" <gaspare(dot)boscarino(at)theoremasystems(dot)com>, Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication lag |
| Date: | 2025-04-18 11:08:50 |
| Message-ID: | 6e85abdb00db4ec0cd8220373b4610838d8a3455.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, 2025-04-18 at 16:21 +0530, Wasim Devale wrote:
> So finally long running on a replica won't minimise replication lag to zero in any scenario? Correct?
I am not sure I understand that sentence correctly.
Yes, if you are running long-running queries on a standby server, that
won't minimize replication lag. But I am surprised that anyone could
imagine it would.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Suman Sangha | 2025-04-19 10:38:51 | Inquiry About Sharing a Job Opportunity with the PostgreSQL Community |
| Previous Message | Wasim Devale | 2025-04-18 10:51:20 | Re: Replication lag |